Some poker friends and I have discussed re-raising an ace that completes in a steal when all we essentially have is an ace blocker in the hole. For example, suppose we have (4A)Q and we are the last card before the bring-in. When an ace completes he is often on a steal and our ace makes it less likely he does have aces so there is a good chance we can win the pot through sheer aggression most likely either on 3rd or 5th street.
A few potential problems with this strategy:
- While it certainly blocks pairs of aces it actually “unblocks” other continuing hands such as pairs (with an ace kicker), three flushes, and broad-way draws. So the removal effect is not as pronounced as one would hope.
- With Ace dead
Pair of or trip aces 8.2%
Pocket pair 5.9%
Three flush 5.1%
KQo, KJo, KTo 3.0%
22.2% - Without Ace dead
Pair of or trip aces 12.0%
Pocket pair 5.6%
Three flush 4.9%
KQo, KJo, KTo 2.8%
25.3% - Assuming these are the continuing ranges the dead ace only makes it 13% less likely a player will continue. However, more often a player will continue lighter which makes the percentage difference smaller.
- Your equity versus the continuation range is quite bad. Folding against a re-raise is bad for your image but you only have around 16% equity versus AA such it’s not quite a plum spot regardless.
- Players typically battle hard and get sticky against someone raising an ace. Even a tight passive player may go to war as it’s almost a challenge of sorts. When you re-raise a card between a ten and a king there are many more legit hands where you would do that such as overpairs or smaller pairs with overcard kickers.
Re-raising an ace is a viable play but it is probably better saved for the times where you would have more equity against a continuing range; namely the times you have pairs, three flushes, and three straights.